ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@rit.edu>
Subject Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
Date Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:31:57 GMT
Hello,

I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN.

Thank you



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J. <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
wrote:

> Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check out
> 3.1.1 from SVN.
> If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from
> the tag for 3.1.1.
>
> -- James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5004@rit.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
>
> Hello,
>    I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations to
> the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use
>    ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast.
>    Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my
> customizations getting removed?
>
>   It would be a great help.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Harpreet
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5004@g.rit.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you so much for your help.
> >
> > Harpreet.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean <
> > Sean.Finan@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Harpreet,
> >>
> >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast
> >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup.  That module
> has
> >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different
> methods
> >> for lookup and matching.  In time trials it has been faster than the
> >> default module (hence the name).  Accuracy depends upon the parameter
> >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are comparable
> or
> >> better.  The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default
> >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a hsql
> >> in-memory version.  Using the in-memory version makes dictionary lookup
> >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second).  Limited
> documentation
> >> is available in the module's doc/ directory.
> >>
> >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write if
> >> you have any questions.
> >>
> >> Sean
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [hsk5004@rit.edu]
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM
> >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>     I would be grateful if someone could help.
> >>
> >>     I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed
> vocabulary.
> >>     I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary look
> up
> >> time.
> >>     But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve the
> >> dictionary look up time?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Harpreet
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message