ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dligach, Dmitriy" <Dmitriy.Dlig...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject Re: markable types
Date Thu, 15 May 2014 13:44:07 GMT
Probably a good idea. Would this new type be related to IdentifiedAnnotation? Its super type?

Dima




On May 15, 2014, at 3:02, Miller, Timothy <Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> What do people think about taking the "markable" types out of the
> coreference project and adding them to the standard type system? This is
> a pretty standard concept in coreference that doesn't really have a
> great natural representation in the current type system -- it
> encompasses IdentifiedAnnotations as well as pronouns ("It", "him",
> "her") and some determiners ("this").
> 
> The drawback I can see is that it is probably not something anyone would
> want extracted -- ultimately you want the actual coref pairs or chains.
> But it is useful for things like representing gold standard input or
> splitting coreference resolution into separate markable recognition and
> relation classification steps.
> 
> Tim
> 


Mime
View raw message