ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject Re: markable types
Date Fri, 16 May 2014 21:35:30 GMT
Hmm, we can check what the current co reference Markable type extends. But my guess is Annotation
for the pronoun use case?- A pronoun could be a Markable, but not necessarily an IdentitfiedAnnotation?

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 16, 2014, at 5:16 PM, "Dligach, Dmitriy" <Dmitriy.Dligach@childrens.harvard.edu>
wrote:
> 
> Probably a good idea. Would this new type be related to IdentifiedAnnotation? Its super
type?
> 
> Dima
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 15, 2014, at 3:02, Miller, Timothy <Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
wrote:
>> 
>> What do people think about taking the "markable" types out of the
>> coreference project and adding them to the standard type system? This is
>> a pretty standard concept in coreference that doesn't really have a
>> great natural representation in the current type system -- it
>> encompasses IdentifiedAnnotations as well as pronouns ("It", "him",
>> "her") and some determiners ("this").
>> 
>> The drawback I can see is that it is probably not something anyone would
>> want extracted -- ultimately you want the actual coref pairs or chains.
>> But it is useful for things like representing gold standard input or
>> splitting coreference resolution into separate markable recognition and
>> relation classification steps.
>> 
>> Tim
> 

Mime
View raw message