ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D." <Wu.Step...@mayo.edu>
Subject Re: markable types
Date Fri, 16 May 2014 23:55:05 GMT
Yeah there's something weird with the mailing system.

stephen

On 5/16/14 4:31 PM, "Dligach, Dmitriy"
<Dmitriy.Dligach@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

>WeirdÅ  I sent this email days ago.
>
>Dima
>
>
>
>
>On May 16, 2014, at 16:16, Dligach, Dmitriy
><Dmitriy.Dligach@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>> Probably a good idea. Would this new type be related to
>>IdentifiedAnnotation? Its super type?
>> 
>> Dima
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 15, 2014, at 3:02, Miller, Timothy
>><Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> What do people think about taking the "markable" types out of the
>>> coreference project and adding them to the standard type system? This
>>>is
>>> a pretty standard concept in coreference that doesn't really have a
>>> great natural representation in the current type system -- it
>>> encompasses IdentifiedAnnotations as well as pronouns ("It", "him",
>>> "her") and some determiners ("this").
>>> 
>>> The drawback I can see is that it is probably not something anyone
>>>would
>>> want extracted -- ultimately you want the actual coref pairs or chains.
>>> But it is useful for things like representing gold standard input or
>>> splitting coreference resolution into separate markable recognition and
>>> relation classification steps.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>> 
>


Mime
View raw message