ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Green <john.travis.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Sectionizer
Date Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:26:18 GMT
To answer my own question, and for anyone searching the mail archives in
the future, I haven't fully explored it yet, but it seems that Vanderbilt
already did this with SecTag.

JG


On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:29 PM, digital paula <cybersation@hotmail.com>wrote:

> John,
>
> I've been out of the loop for a few weeks now w/the cTAKES developer list
> and will be until end of Feb... too many pressing deadlines.  I have to
> step through the code again to verify if sectionizer uses reg ex but I'm
> pretty sure that it does.   Hmmm, that does sound interesting to train the
> sectionizer from clinical notes.   Not familiar with Mastif so hopefully
> someone else can chime in on your question there.   Talk to you and
> everyone very soon.  :-)
>
> Regards,
> Paula
>
> > Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 17:05:40 -0500
> > Subject: Sectionizer
> > From: john.travis.green@gmail.com
> > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> >
> > I know there has been some chatter about sectionizers. From what I
> > understand Paula is doing, and from what I understand YTEX does, they are
> > all regular expression based, correct?
> >
> > Has anyone added to rule based matching a statistical/Markov type
> > sectionizer? E.g. one trained from a bunch of notes?
> >
> > Does Mastif work this way?
> >
> > Thanks all,
> > JG
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message