ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D." <Wu.Step...@mayo.edu>
Subject Re: relation types in typesystem
Date Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:28:24 GMT
That's right.
BinaryTextRelations connect Annotations.
ElementRelations connect Elements.

In practice we have only ever used Annotations and BinaryTextRelations.

stephen



On 10/21/13 2:20 PM, "Tim Miller" <timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
wrote:

>I'm not sure I understand the distinction between BinaryTextRelation and
>ElementRelation types. Is it the difference between the abstract
>relation and a particular text instantiation?
>
>On 10/17/2013 02:33 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
>> +1 creation of additional relation types, both BinaryTextRelation and
>> ElementRelation.
>>
>> stephen
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/13 12:20 PM, "Tim Miller"
>><timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed yesterday that the ctakes type system is missing some of the
>>> types from the SHARP annotations. This causes an error when we try to
>>> read in data with those types with our reader. I created a JIRA for the
>>> issue here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-250
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on whether I should just implement them or is there some
>>> reason to have a more detailed discussion?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Tim Miller, PhD
>>> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>>> Children's Hospital Informatics Program
>>> Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
>>> 617-919-1223
>>>
>


Mime
View raw message