ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Spurrier <robert.spurr...@explorys.com>
Subject Re: Converting cTAKES to UIMAfit
Date Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:02:42 GMT
Excellent. I mostly was thinking in terms of pipeline creation,types,and
input params. I agree with your note that they aren't completely without
purpose.  I'll check it out and begin to hack away when possible.

-Rob

On 10/1/13 2:53 PM, "Pei Chen" <chenpei@apache.org> wrote:

>Agreed,
>There have been few good places where uimaFIT may be useful:
>Feel free to check out any existing items and add/create items:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-135?jql=project%20%3D%20CTAKE
>S%20AND%20text%20~%20uimafit
>
>On the top of my head:
>1) Type System detection
>2) JCasUtil (selectCovered, etc.)
>3) Input Parameter handling
>4) Annotator, Pipeline instantiation/creation
>
>Note: There may be a valid use case to have a few default XML
>configurations (mainly in production use where you may want to swap
>configs
>without having to recompile code.)
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Spurrier <
>robert.spurrier@explorys.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Working with UIMAfit makes annotator/pipeline development a sheer joy. I
>> thouroughly dislike keeping track of annotator descriptors  during
>> development.
>>
>> Is it worth converting cTAKES to use UIMAfit as exclusively as
>>possible? I
>> would not mind taking on that responsibility if It meant blowing away as
>> many descriptors as possible =]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>



Mime
View raw message