ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Miller <timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject Re: relation types in typesystem
Date Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:16:20 GMT
Well, it's in the annotation guidelines and the typesystem. Whether 
there are any examples annotated like that I couldn't tell you. But 
there does seem to be at least one conditional relation in the 
stratified corpus, since it broke the code that reads the knowtator xml.
Tim

On 10/22/2013 11:06 AM, Dmitriy Dligach wrote:
> Is polarity/uncertainty annotated for relations in the SHARP gold 
> standard?
>
> Dima
>
> On 10/22/2013 10:45 AM, Tim Miller wrote:
>> One more issue is with conditional attribute of relations. It is in 
>> the sharp annotation guidelines I have access to but not in the 
>> implemented typesystem nor in the typesystem documents I have. Should 
>> there be a conditional field alongside polarity and uncertainty for 
>> Relation?
>> Tim
>>
>> On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
>>> That's right.
>>> BinaryTextRelations connect Annotations.
>>> ElementRelations connect Elements.
>>>
>>> In practice we have only ever used Annotations and BinaryTextRelations.
>>>
>>> stephen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/21/13 2:20 PM, "Tim Miller" 
>>> <timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure I understand the distinction between 
>>>> BinaryTextRelation and
>>>> ElementRelation types. Is it the difference between the abstract
>>>> relation and a particular text instantiation?
>>>>
>>>> On 10/17/2013 02:33 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
>>>>> +1 creation of additional relation types, both BinaryTextRelation and
>>>>> ElementRelation.
>>>>>
>>>>> stephen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/17/13 12:20 PM, "Tim Miller"
>>>>> <timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed yesterday that the ctakes type system is missing some 
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> types from the SHARP annotations. This causes an error when we 
>>>>>> try to
>>>>>> read in data with those types with our reader. I created a JIRA 
>>>>>> for the
>>>>>> issue here:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-250
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts on whether I should just implement them or is there

>>>>>> some
>>>>>> reason to have a more detailed discussion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Tim Miller, PhD
>>>>>> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>>>>>> Children's Hospital Informatics Program
>>>>>> Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
>>>>>> 617-919-1223
>>>>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message