ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Miller <timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject Re: relation types in typesystem
Date Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:45:49 GMT
One more issue is with conditional attribute of relations. It is in the 
sharp annotation guidelines I have access to but not in the implemented 
typesystem nor in the typesystem documents I have. Should there be a 
conditional field alongside polarity and uncertainty for Relation?
Tim

On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
> That's right.
> BinaryTextRelations connect Annotations.
> ElementRelations connect Elements.
>
> In practice we have only ever used Annotations and BinaryTextRelations.
>
> stephen
>
>
>
> On 10/21/13 2:20 PM, "Tim Miller" <timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand the distinction between BinaryTextRelation and
>> ElementRelation types. Is it the difference between the abstract
>> relation and a particular text instantiation?
>>
>> On 10/17/2013 02:33 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
>>> +1 creation of additional relation types, both BinaryTextRelation and
>>> ElementRelation.
>>>
>>> stephen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/17/13 12:20 PM, "Tim Miller"
>>> <timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed yesterday that the ctakes type system is missing some of the
>>>> types from the SHARP annotations. This causes an error when we try to
>>>> read in data with those types with our reader. I created a JIRA for the
>>>> issue here:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-250
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on whether I should just implement them or is there some
>>>> reason to have a more detailed discussion?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Tim Miller, PhD
>>>> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>>>> Children's Hospital Informatics Program
>>>> Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
>>>> 617-919-1223
>>>>


Mime
View raw message