ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.Ja...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: NCI references out of date
Date Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:38:43 GMT

I wonder if Google's localization is finding 2.5 ahead of Apache cTAKES for you but not for
For me when I search just on cTAKES, the Apache cTAKES site is higher than 2.5 in the results

-----Original Message-----
From: dev-return-2036-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org [mailto:dev-return-2036-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:09 AM
To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org'
Subject: RE: NCI references out of date

There is a NOTE in the Introduction of the 2.5 page. 
It references Apache cTAKES as incubating though. And apparently is not prominent enough.
I will update that and find a way to make it more prominent.

-----Original Message-----
From: dev-return-2035-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org [mailto:dev-return-2035-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Bleeker, Troy C.
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:03 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: RE: NCI references out of date

I agree that we should continue to change any other existing "front door" or mechanism that
we know of that points to the current cTAKES. The primary goal, as you say, would be to get
new users (or old ones coming back) to the right place within just a few clicks.
-----Original Message-----
From: dev-return-2034-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org [mailto:dev-return-2034-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Andy McMurry
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:00 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: NCI references out of date

HI Troy et al: 

I noticed that the NCI is still referring to cTakes 2.5. 

Should we 
A) update the other sites with each new cTakes version
B) redirect to apache ctakes 


I dont mean to harp on this issue, but it is the front door that I keep finding via Google
searches for cTakes content. 
Which means many of our users may still be going to these other sites and getting stale info.

Thoughts? Votes? 

PS: we have a new cTakes paper on de-identification about to be published any day now. 
WIll post when link is live. 

View raw message