ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: pico pipeline
Date Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:41:46 GMT
Hi Samir,
Perhaps others can chime in as well as I'm not too familiar with the proposed pipeline-
But it looks really interesting- especially the higher level components such as the Intervention
Annotator (are you planning to write code/logic to 'infer' what the cause or prognosis was?,etc).
Yes, one can certainly use the already annotated data from the existing components.  Some

-          SentenceDetector, Tokenizer is listed twice in the pipeline (is that just a typo?)

-          I think there may be other components that you may want to include which might
help with your higher level annotators (some of which may or may not be available in mata-map):

o   Assertion (Negation, Subject, History-of, etc.)

o   Co Reference

o   Semantic Role Labeler

o   Temporal?

From: samir chabou [mailto:samirchb@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:43 AM
To: Chen, Pei; dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: pico pipeline

Hi Pei,
I'm trying to use ctakes to annotate PICO question concepts. I attached to you the pipeline
that I'll construct to do so. Please can you have a quick look to the attached file and tell
me if i'm on the right track or if you have some suggestions.
Thanks a lot

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message