ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on ctakes.apache.org ?
Date Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:16:29 GMT
Added:
http://ctakes.apache.org/relatedresources.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:Masanz.James@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:04 AM
> To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on
> ctakes.apache.org ?
> 
> +1
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev-return-1727-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org
> [mailto:dev-return-1727-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org] On
> Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:54 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on
> ctakes.apache.org ?
> 
> +1 makes total sense, should be a great way to show off the project.
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of
> Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <Chen>, Pei <Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu>
> Reply-To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" <dev@ctakes.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 7:45 PM
> To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" <dev@ctakes.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: how do you feel about putting public presentations on
> ctakes.apache.org ?
> 
> >+1 for a Related Resources with public links.
> >There have been a couple of recently accepted/published papers that can
> >illustrate what could be done with cTAKES which would fit nicely into
> >that page...
> >________________________________________
> >From: Girivaraprasad Nambari [girinambari@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:15 PM
> >To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: how do you feel about putting public presentations on
> >ctakes.apache.org ?
> >
> >I think it would be good to have a page on Wiki with title something
> >like "Related resources" (Apache Mahout has similar page I guess) and
> >add relevant "public" links here. I know we can't pull everything to
> >this page, but whatever core team thinks are valuable at least (or)
> >referred while implementing the code.
> >
> >I think this page will give high level overview on what frameworks
> >developers need to be aware of while using ctakes.
> >
> >For example, we can add following links:
> >
> >https://code.google.com/p/uimafit/wiki/GettingStarted
> >http://knowtator.sourceforge.net/quickstart.shtml
> >
> >And some links related to "SVM" and "MaxEnt" related information
> >etc.,(Which were referred by original implementer).
> >
> >This way people who want to extend/add new features and referring
> >existing implementation will be able to go through these to get
> >understanding on what is happening inside ctakes.
> >
> >Thank you,
> >Giri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Andy McMurry <mcmurry.andy@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Argument FOR:
> >>
> >> Videos can also be very educational for new users!
> >> For example, this cTAKES description by Guergana :
> >> https://vimeo.com/24829353
> >>
> >> Publishing our slides or video -- for example recent the NLP
> >>presentations  from the i2b2 user group -- gives folks a very real
> >>sense of the kinds of  problems we are currently working on.
> >> A lot of people can't make it to these events. The slides are on the
> >>web  anyway, just harder to find if you dont know already.
> >>
> >> Argument AGAINST:
> >>
> >> Sharing your ideas before they are published in a journal can be bad
> >>for  academic credit!
> >> Make every effort to separate the scientific research from
> >>engineering  product.
> >> There is little value in sharing an idea without an implementation
> >>anyway,  this is already complicated enough with stable software.
> >>
> >> ~~~
> >> I can see both perspectives.
> >> Curious what others think about this.
> >>
> >> --Andy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>


Mime
View raw message