Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ctakes.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu
 designates 134.174.13.92 as permitted sender)
From: "Chen, Pei" <Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu>
To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" <dev@ctakes.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
Thread-Topic: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
Thread-Index: Ac42w1Fsi1aSuGCPT8ilmEack29lnAAVVEHV
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:58:47 +0000
Message-ID: <924DE05C19409B438EB81DE683A942D9104D60FE@CHEXMBX1A.CHBOSTON.ORG>
References: <D18F0F6D-0C43-4EC1-AF02-18ED81600B6F@colorado.edu>
In-Reply-To: <D18F0F6D-0C43-4EC1-AF02-18ED81600B6F@colorado.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Steve,=0A=
I think that would make sense...  should be fairly straightforward and tran=
sparent change.  I can take a closer look next week with a clear mind.=0A=
________________________________________=0A=
From: Steven Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]=0A=
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM=0A=
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org=0A=
Subject: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?=0A=
=0A=
On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:05 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wro=
te:=0A=
>=0A=
> And ctakes-drug-ner-res is listed within the Maven Dependencies for ctake=
s-drug-ner=0A=
=0A=
Shouldn't it be exactly the opposite of this? Shouldn't ctakes-drug-ner-res=
 depend on ctakes-drug-ner? Otherwise, Maven's always going to pull in ctak=
es-drug-ner-res whenever you use ctakes-drug-ner. I.e. with the current set=
up, it's impossible to depend on just the code, not the models.=0A=
=0A=
Steve=0A=
=0A=