ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
Date Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:58:47 GMT
Steve,
I think that would make sense...  should be fairly straightforward and transparent change.
 I can take a closer look next week with a clear mind.
________________________________________
From: Steven Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?

On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:05 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
> And ctakes-drug-ner-res is listed within the Maven Dependencies for ctakes-drug-ner

Shouldn't it be exactly the opposite of this? Shouldn't ctakes-drug-ner-res depend on ctakes-drug-ner?
Otherwise, Maven's always going to pull in ctakes-drug-ner-res whenever you use ctakes-drug-ner.
I.e. with the current setup, it's impossible to depend on just the code, not the models.

Steve


Mime
View raw message