Mailing-List: contact ctakes-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
To: "'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'" <ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
Thread-Topic: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
Thread-Index: AQHOGtx2/2j4OCQ56kmAdkCVPX8GN5ia0HkA///vToA=
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:32:50 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <996FC801C05DF64A84246A106FACACD00A2A95@MSGPEXCHA08A.mfad.mfroot.org>
References: 
 <1fe859d8979a63865e15901255950490c16daa4a.code@ohnlp.p.sourceforge.net>
	<17AF398312DD794DA242A9F081B060DB10E3AC8B@CHEXMBX3A.CHBOSTON.ORG>
 <CAPjDuTvgTrNk1gMPQvBif9=JCbrDiGOjXz+z7pdaVVnVJTeH1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPjDuTvgTrNk1gMPQvBif9=JCbrDiGOjXz+z7pdaVVnVJTeH1w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

As I recall, once something is on sourceforge, you can't just delete it.

Plus as Britt pointed out there are people still using an older version and=
 we shouldn't want to totally delete information about previous releases.

If there are any pages that need stronger wording and you don't have access=
 to update the page, if you send me your suggestions, I can update them.

-- James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-1345-Masanz.James=3Dmayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1345-
> Masanz.James=3Dmayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Britt Fitch
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 10:29 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
>=20
> Can we update the pages that point to the old version to strongly
> suggest that they visit the new Apache pages, rather than remove the old
> version?
> Or can we move the artifacts for the old version to an archive in
> Apache?
> Andy McMurry and I still maintain the Scrubber tool which depends on an
> older version of cTAKES. It is our plan to update it, but we have not
> done so yet.
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Dligach, Dmitriy <
> Dmitriy.Dligach@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>=20
> > Should we consider getting rid of the sourceforge version of cTAKES
> > completely to avoid confusing people who want to download cTAKES for
> > the first time? Depending on how you google it, the sourceforge
> > version might come up first.
> >
> > Dima
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> <
> > noreply+project-upgrade@in.sf.net<mailto:noreply+project-upgrade@in.sf
> > noreply+.net
> > >>
> > Date: March 6, 2013 9:35:41 PM EST
> > To: <noreply@in.sf.net<mailto:noreply@in.sf.net>>
> > Subject: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
> > Reply-To: <noreply@in.sf.net<mailto:noreply@in.sf.net>>
> >
> > Your code repository in upgraded project ohnlp is now ready for use.
> >
> > Old repository url: http://ohnlp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ohnlp
> >
> > New repository checkout command: svn checkout --username=3Ddimdym
> > svn+ssh:// dimdym@svn.code.sf.net/p/ohnlp/code/trunk ohnlp-code
> >
> > You should do a checkout using the new repository location.  The old
> > repository is read-only now.
> >
> > For more detailed instructions on migrating to your new repo, please
> > see
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/Repository%20Upgrade%20
> > FAQ/
> >
> > --
> > SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> has sent this mailing to you
> > as a registered user of the SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net>
> > site to convey important information regarding your
> > SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> account or your use of
> > SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> services.
> > If you have concerns about this mailing please contact our Support
> > team per: http://sourceforge.net/support
> >
> >