ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kim Ebert <kim.eb...@perfectsearchcorp.com>
Subject Re: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:17:15 GMT
Are we still keeping the models in SourceForge?

Kim Ebert
1.801.669.7342
Perfect Search Corp
http://www.perfectsearchcorp.com/

On 03/07/2013 03:05 PM, Andy McMurry wrote:
> Goal: everyone is able to find what they are looking for with minimal confusion. 
>
> @PROPOSAL: when the history page is written on the new Apache site, we archive the previous
2.X releases here on Apache. 
> The SF pages would then redirect (http 302) or simply a banner  "cTAKES is now an officially
hosted Apache project. Click here " 
>
> Same goes for the NCI website that can give the impression that the NCI is the home for
cTAKES. 
>
> my 2 cents, 
> --Andy 
>
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:32 PM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
>> As I recall, once something is on sourceforge, you can't just delete it.
>>
>> Plus as Britt pointed out there are people still using an older version and we shouldn't
want to totally delete information about previous releases.
>>
>> If there are any pages that need stronger wording and you don't have access to update
the page, if you send me your suggestions, I can update them.
>>
>> -- James
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1345-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1345-
>>> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Britt Fitch
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 10:29 AM
>>> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
>>>
>>> Can we update the pages that point to the old version to strongly
>>> suggest that they visit the new Apache pages, rather than remove the old
>>> version?
>>> Or can we move the artifacts for the old version to an archive in
>>> Apache?
>>> Andy McMurry and I still maintain the Scrubber tool which depends on an
>>> older version of cTAKES. It is our plan to update it, but we have not
>>> done so yet.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Dligach, Dmitriy <
>>> Dmitriy.Dligach@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should we consider getting rid of the sourceforge version of cTAKES
>>>> completely to avoid confusing people who want to download cTAKES for
>>>> the first time? Depending on how you google it, the sourceforge
>>>> version might come up first.
>>>>
>>>> Dima
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>> From: SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> <
>>>> noreply+project-upgrade@in.sf.net<mailto:noreply+project-upgrade@in.sf
>>>> noreply+.net
>>>> Date: March 6, 2013 9:35:41 PM EST
>>>> To: <noreply@in.sf.net<mailto:noreply@in.sf.net>>
>>>> Subject: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete
>>>> Reply-To: <noreply@in.sf.net<mailto:noreply@in.sf.net>>
>>>>
>>>> Your code repository in upgraded project ohnlp is now ready for use.
>>>>
>>>> Old repository url: http://ohnlp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ohnlp
>>>>
>>>> New repository checkout command: svn checkout --username=dimdym
>>>> svn+ssh:// dimdym@svn.code.sf.net/p/ohnlp/code/trunk ohnlp-code
>>>>
>>>> You should do a checkout using the new repository location.  The old
>>>> repository is read-only now.
>>>>
>>>> For more detailed instructions on migrating to your new repo, please
>>>> see
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/Repository%20Upgrade%20
>>>> FAQ/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> has sent this mailing to you
>>>> as a registered user of the SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net>
>>>> site to convey important information regarding your
>>>> SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> account or your use of
>>>> SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> services.
>>>> If you have concerns about this mailing please contact our Support
>>>> team per: http://sourceforge.net/support
>>>>
>>>>
>


Mime
View raw message