Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 864421155D for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19673 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2014 18:59:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@crunch.apache.org Received: (qmail 19629 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2014 18:59:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@crunch.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@crunch.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@crunch.apache.org Received: (qmail 19525 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2014 18:59:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19496 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2014 18:59:34 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Jul 2014 18:59:34 +0000 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gabriel Reid (JIRA)" To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CRUNCH-438) Visualizations of some important internal/intermediate pipeline planning states MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14053187#comment-14053187 ] Gabriel Reid commented on CRUNCH-438: ------------------------------------- Agree with Josh on the coolness of this, I'm super-excited about this one. Do we want to write these files on every run as in CRUNCH-418? I'm thinking that they're more of a planner debugging tool (although maybe I'm seeing that wrong), so maybe it would be better to just stick them in the Configuration object as is done with the end-plan dot file. I've got the feeling that it might be a bit confusing for someone who just wants to see what their actual job plan looks like to get four different options. Also, one tiny nit: the RTNode#getEmiter method name should be getEmitter, although as far as I can see it's not used anywhere so it can probably just be dropped. > Visualizations of some important internal/intermediate pipeline planning states > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CRUNCH-438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-438 > Project: Crunch > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 0.10.0, 0.8.3 > Reporter: Christian Tzolov > Assignee: Christian Tzolov > Attachments: CRUNCH-438.patch > > > To improve the understability of the pipeline planning stages it would help to visualize some intermediate planning states like: > - PCollection lineage. (visualizing the output-pcollection-targets structure) > - MSCRPlanner's planning Graphs before and after the split up of dependent GBK nodes > - RTNode hierarchy along with the Input and Output configurations as persistent in the Configuration before the execution of the pipeline. > Most of the information can be intercepted in the MSCRPlanner#plan() method. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)