Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F5E511F44 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8466 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2014 13:59:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@crunch.apache.org Received: (qmail 8436 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2014 13:59:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@crunch.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@crunch.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@crunch.apache.org Received: (qmail 8414 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2014 13:59:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8411 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2014 13:59:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 13:59:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:59:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Christian Tzolov (JIRA)" To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CRUNCH-438) Visualizations of some important internal/intermediate pipeline planning states MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Tzolov updated CRUNCH-438: ------------------------------------ Attachment: CRUNCH-438.3.patch Gabriel i think your point makes sense. So i've attached a new patch (v3) that removes the functionality that writes dotfiles into the PIPELINE_DOTFILE_OUTPUT_DIR folder. Also i've fixed (hopefully) the spelling names. The debug diagrams will be stored i the following configuration properties: * PCOLLECTION_LINEAGE_DOTFILE * BASE_GRAPH_PLAN_DOTFILE * SPLIT_GRAPH_PLAN_DOTFILE * RTNODES_PLAN_DOTFILE Would it make sense to enable the 'debug' dotfiles generation only if the pipeliene.enbableDebug() is set? Also shall we move all DotfileWriter... clases into a dedicated package? For example: org.apache.crunch.impl.mr.plan.tracke > Visualizations of some important internal/intermediate pipeline planning states > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CRUNCH-438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-438 > Project: Crunch > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 0.10.0, 0.8.3 > Reporter: Christian Tzolov > Assignee: Christian Tzolov > Attachments: CRUNCH-438.2.patch, CRUNCH-438.3.patch, CRUNCH-438.patch > > > To improve the understability of the pipeline planning stages it would help to visualize some intermediate planning states like: > - PCollection lineage. (visualizing the output-pcollection-targets structure) > - MSCRPlanner's planning Graphs before and after the split up of dependent GBK nodes > - RTNode hierarchy along with the Input and Output configurations as persistent in the Configuration before the execution of the pipeline. > Most of the information can be intercepted in the MSCRPlanner#plan() method. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)