crunch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Wills <jwi...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Editing the Crunch User Guide
Date Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:12:04 GMT
I'm still good with commit-then-review for the website, although we have
slowly moved towards more reviews of code over time as the project has
grown.


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Gabriel Reid <gabriel.reid@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Josh (and others),
>
> I was wondering if you had any preferences on how we go about handling
> changes to the User Guide (and website content in general). Is there a
> preference to go with a review-then-commit workflow, or
> commit-then-review (or something else)?
>
> I'm assuming that at this point that there won't be any huge major
> additions to it, but I figure it wouldn't be bad to have a general
> agreement on how we want to handle editing it. FWIW, up until now the
> (very minor) changes I've made have just been going straight in
> without any review.
>
> - Gabriel
>



-- 
Director of Data Science
Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message