Mailing-List: contact dev-help@crunch.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@crunch.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130303202259.GA9024@mafr.de>
References: <20130303075556.GA3659@mafr.de>
 <CAH29n6MuymS-S1eAu0udHYZ1dNhxFfTiSkOn0Tn-yit3p=h_tA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130303175450.GA8891@mafr.de>
 <CAH29n6MjB-DcbgYh_GzJHOk-j17CDC5C2squ3sNc0=nCjqkQ3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA5C_ps-abOW9OGf5neWZtMZx7zXOd5=bjG4OPcf8P+FjpnV1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130303202259.GA9024@mafr.de>
From: Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:27:08 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CANLc_9JENxARNPSEkzQbd3EFMBcQe--fs8oDfx3u+ahYrcs=HA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bylaws for Crunch
To: dev@crunch.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'd suggest having a fixed term for the PMC chair. 1 year is good imo.

Patrick

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Matthias Friedrich <matt@mafr.de> wrote:
> On Sunday, 2013-03-03, Gabriel Reid wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Josh Wills <jwills@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Matthias Friedrich <matt@mafr.de> wrote:
>
>>>> Nope, that seems to be it. I'm perfectly happy with the Zookeeper
>>>> model. I'd use it as a template and fine-tune it a bit:
>
>>>> I'd remove everything about sub-projects; the consensus at Apache
>>>> seems to be that we shouldn't have them.
>
>>>> I'm not sure if we need to do anything about code changes. I can live
>>>> with lazy approval - people are still likely to ask for feedback on
>>>> larger or potentially controversal changes. We're a small project,
>>>> no need to over-regulate things.
>
>>> +1 to all of the above.
>
>> +1 from me as well.
>
> Great. I'll leave this thread up for a few more days so others have
> a chance to comment. If no changes are requested I'll create a
> document that we can vote on. 2/3 majority seems appropriate.
>
> Regards,
>   Matthias