creadur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: [jira] [Resolved] (RAT-219) RAT project uses groupId: org.apache.rat instead of org.apache.creadur.rat
Date Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:33:37 GMT
Hi Jochen,

On 11/09/16 14:15, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarbaise@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> first if it is an informal decision why not making a formal decision of
>> it...to make a clear line where RAT belongs to?
>>
>> And why just setting it to Won't Fix to get it out of scope? We can create a
>> milestone 1.0.0 to assign it to it and may be we should change it earlier...
>
>
> As I wrote: You are committers, feel free to go on. I won't object.
> (No guarantees, that others feel different.)

 > OTOH,  I don't see any
> problem for users here,

 > so I don't see any need for a Jira issue.

I find it very important to document things via JIRA for at least two 
reasons.

First a users which takes a look can see what we have in 
mind/ideas/improvements/bugs otherwise where should it be documentented 
and second a potential contributor can take a look into the list of 
issues and decide to work on some of them...

Furthermore you can use the JIRA as a good based for release notes to 
create them automatically...

Just my thoughts about that...

Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise

Mime
View raw message