Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5335200B63 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:29:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A3B75160AA7; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DF5B3160A6C for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 59607 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2016 07:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59596 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2016 07:29:17 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:29:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.33] (x55b20d67.dyn.telefonica.de [85.178.13.103]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 880961A0055 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Rat 0.12 To: dev@creadur.apache.org References: <00b364ad-d9ec-6f17-77dc-52f07acf11a5@gmx.de> From: "P. Ottlinger" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:29:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00b364ad-d9ec-6f17-77dc-52f07acf11a5@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:29:18 -0000 Hi, thanks for reaching out. Am 14.08.2016 um 15:23 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: > I would like to know why the web site is not updated ? Currently shows > 0.11 ? The problem is that not many people know how to trigger and perform website updates - apart from that the 0.12 webpage is broken .... There has been some discussion on how to simplify the approach but no consensus yet :-( Phil