Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB46200AEF for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 08:52:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 69134160A1A; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B003F160969 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 08:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 90714 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2016 06:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90702 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2016 06:52:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:52:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2DB6CC0D91 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:52:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RCXnA3D0eTmu for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C13575F3F2 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id sh2so35949548lbb.1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 23:52:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rnwyA+ZwNNwLfMvXr6kgq7QlvmNER2LtQjTwYG4McFs=; b=qz3b4XnhHFczIlC4186iH4QCzVlVv3HWOrPwcm+Le8AIsXJmAxE8P1YlLt9ia0J/KB 1kLRy4uDx0jhviTk5eKNf9R4k/QNZV0qs2QJW8SnNdLzG68pOdrjE4iBXofck1A8mdcb ulqmZl/7M5dmMpRo6WN2zze86LdSfEMZzNSCdbKYjoUZSwQAN8/8wKh6DJIhknF3CkxR J54C2N6I3jQ9mCqBAMNARwDprp/X1gMLens3zOcfUCZyxcbr/fG3vhr34uvh67kjTVR2 ap7dzqPsptmuSplXLaFD1kHzYAzjvmCmbKeYiTeLmVUKC7er+RfZb+FUthFJcLQNAJ5A aySg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rnwyA+ZwNNwLfMvXr6kgq7QlvmNER2LtQjTwYG4McFs=; b=Vf/U0C/YhqBwEDmfkbW592Vh1mwoe3K/2JiS3Gldj8PYTF0U/jMnSfK+GYFg1taHU8 sWZPQflYbCTxXcYrvKvaMmuDgBhlHVY5BLrbndqcCTEUSTCAfeg89sN1YEHDSAtmj6Nu shKeb2dC3CrWabOyfpzJUBF7I2XLG5jpCOTUZhyE3WsJfy4bLpfyeHNnvG4dw5YgqBNT HhvDN13R86TfysaUrELr5jVQd8t7cPBYr8uiynao1dVGDyhuzPWLkTlBYE/sbKOUSCi3 lqmiUBkZTpOmb+hSYZKWA1ies/8gndMswdlCOSgWsCXC1xt2zjQ6Ps9P4s1i7R/HHE7Q E/7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tInwJs+osYPPIi7pn48/SoHQnMbsFJsrXdcZeYOVIAD88cu4UlFP7MDRgT7pptvDh8TEhvhhIVIlttISw== X-Received: by 10.112.163.73 with SMTP id yg9mr5394376lbb.73.1464418326932; Fri, 27 May 2016 23:52:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.81.4 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 23:51:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Jochen Wiedmann Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 08:51:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: -bin and -src files on Maven Central To: dev@creadur.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Sat, 28 May 2016 06:52:12 -0000 Hi, I'd like to havae a short discussion regarding the -src, and -bin files on Maven Central. First of all, please keep in mind, that we did this before, and noone bothered: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/ Second, the reason why we are doing this: It is simply, that we can delegate generation of GPG signatures, as well as MD5, and SHA1 hashes to the deploy plugin. I won't change that behaviour, unless someone explains me how to do the same without the deploy plugin. Thanks, Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg