Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-2752-apmail-creadur-dev-archive=creadur.apache.org@creadur.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 521F8104A6
	for <apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 16 Feb 2015 21:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 92732 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2015 21:31:12 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92683 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2015 21:31:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@creadur.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@creadur.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@creadur.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.creadur.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92506 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2015 21:31:12 -0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 21:31:12 +0000
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 21:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Dan Dumont (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12768549.1421706890000.58539.1424122272101@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12768549.1421706890000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12768549.1421706890000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12768549.1421706890848@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (RAT-190) False negatives(?) in apache rat
 license checking
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14323326#comment-14323326 ] 

Dan Dumont commented on RAT-190:
--------------------------------

AHH!!!

-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 finally caused it to fail!

Hmmm...   how is it that RAT approves the files in the case where it's not the same?   I would prefer it to be picky about different encodings instead of passing them.

> False negatives(?) in apache rat license checking
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RAT-190
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-190
>             Project: Apache Rat
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.11
>            Reporter: Dan Dumont
>            Assignee: Philipp Ottlinger
>         Attachments: complete-pom.xml, test.zip
>
>
> We're using rat to enforce our internal copyright on all of our source files.
> We're seeing it missing files that should be flagged.  Here's part of our pom:
> <licenses>
>   <license implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense">
>     <licenseFamilyCategory>IBMCL</licenseFamilyCategory>
>     <licenseFamilyName>IBM Copyright</licenseFamilyName>
>     <notes></notes>
>     <patterns>
>       <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2015</pattern>
>       <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2014, 2015</pattern>
>       <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2013, 2015</pattern>
>     </patterns>
>   </license>
> </licenses>
> <licenseFamilies>
>   <licenseFamily implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily">
>   <familyName>IBM Copyright</familyName>
> </licenseFamily>
> </licenseFamilies>
> The file in question is "included" as reported by running with debug output...  but the file's copyright is:
> /* Copyright IBM Corp. 2014  All Rights Reserved.                    */



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)