Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJmbs8jfieuaa8AqQ6UhBdUNbXWuviFV49L_PK1q1RiieY8ujQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAJmbs8i8fEXTKA=bcNX0cuperrxb3oYO6Y=--Q5ngDw06UdcaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VafbFvBqNdaj48yTaTJUc8Cskh4q3s=OCwGBA999LxKVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJmbs8h6gbnYSkfzv4y6SX2YFJhrc0i7pVf+6_92iNV-P-WMzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0Vaumk2VLpMd6muWDD4kjcFRaU=O9JbqNb0hDJzcvdeVUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJmbs8gC1hLDj4T1qTwLT7ZKa2SMBOM=VaW+We2etYO4Qc5sgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJmbs8iycyhz+K__umjAOrK28j9cv6y2nsWbxvNEDT2oW2t5rQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJmbs8jfieuaa8AqQ6UhBdUNbXWuviFV49L_PK1q1RiieY8ujQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:21:27 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAOGo0VY+Dvdjdv2YrXrJo+rm7O8iP++ctmGkQ9xY9iKfQgGF_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adding custom licenses
From: sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 16 September 2014 18:05, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong?
> Is it possible to add approved licenses to default ones?

Does not look to be possible with the Maven plugin currently; if any
licenseFamily entries are added, then the defaults don't seem to be
used.

I'm surprised that it works differently with the Ant task.

> On 16 September 2014 20:08, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> actually it works in ant
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/branches/3.0.x/build.xml
>> (search for report_rat)
>> was hoping to get similar functionality with maven
>>
>> On 16 September 2014 19:26, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, In addition to default ones
>>>
>>> On 16 September 2014 19:12, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So the issue is that you want to be able to mark the new licenses as
>>>> approved - is that correct?
>>>>
>>>> On 16 September 2014 12:20, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I get report like this (some lines are omitted):
>>>> >
>>>> > 0 Unknown Licenses
>>>> >
>>>> > *******************************
>>>> >
>>>> > Unapproved licenses:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css
>>>> >
>>>> > *****************************************************
>>>> >   Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL
>>>> >   Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B
>>>> >   Compressed archives will be marked A
>>>> >   Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
>>>> >   AL
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xsd
>>>> >   AL
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xml
>>>> >   B
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/default/_big_profile_pic.jpg
>>>> > ......................................
>>>> >  !MIT+GPL
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js
>>>> > ......................................
>>>> >  !MIT
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css
>>>> > ......................................
>>>> >  !MIT+GPL
>>>> >
>>>> /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css
>>>> > ......................................
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 16 September 2014 18:01, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 16 September 2014 08:04, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > Hello All,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Sorry for the long email :(
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Today I added apache-rat-plugin (0.11) to our maven build (
>>>> >> > openmeetings.apache.org project)
>>>> >> > We have couple of jQuery files in our sources licensed under MIT and
>>>> >> > MIT+GPL and not recognized by apache-rat-plugin.
>>>> >> > So I have added custom licences:
>>>> >> > <licenses>
>>>> >> > <license
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense">
>>>> >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT+GPL</licenseFamilyCategory>
>>>> >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT and GPL v2</licenseFamilyName>
>>>> >> > <notes></notes>
>>>> >> > <patterns>
>>>> >> > <pattern>Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2
>>>> licenses.</pattern>
>>>> >> > </patterns>
>>>> >> > </license>
>>>> >> > <license
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense">
>>>> >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT</licenseFamilyCategory>
>>>> >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT</licenseFamilyName>
>>>> >> > <notes></notes>
>>>> >> > <patterns>
>>>> >> > <pattern>Licensed MIT</pattern>
>>>> >> > </patterns>
>>>> >> > </license>
>>>> >> > </licenses>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> OK
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > <licenseFamilies>
>>>> >> > <licenseFamily
>>>> >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily">
>>>> >> > <familyName>MIT and GPL v2</familyName>
>>>> >> > </licenseFamily>
>>>> >> > <licenseFamily
>>>> >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily">
>>>> >> > <familyName>MIT</familyName>
>>>> >> > </licenseFamily>
>>>> >> > </licenseFamilies>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What happens if you omit the <licenseFamilies> section?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > Unfortunately after that Apache licensed files are not approved any
>>>> more
>>>> >> > *******************************
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Unapproved licenses:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >   pom.xml
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > *******************************
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Archives:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > *****************************************************
>>>> >> >   Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL
>>>> >> >   Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B
>>>> >> >   Compressed archives will be marked A
>>>> >> >   Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
>>>> >> >  !AL    pom.xml
>>>> >> >   N     CHANGELOG
>>>> >> >   N     NOTICE
>>>> >> >   N     README
>>>> >> >   N     LICENSE
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > adding
>>>> >> > <addDefaultLicenseMatchers>true</addDefaultLicenseMatchers>
>>>> >> > also doesn't help
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Is there any option to add licences to default ones?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Thanks in advance
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > WBR
>>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > WBR
>>>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax