Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DB1A10A72 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7331 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2013 21:44:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7269 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2013 21:44:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7261 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2013 21:44:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:44:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk designates 80.0.253.65 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.0.253.65] (HELO know-smtprelay-omc-1.server.virginmedia.net) (80.0.253.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:44:10 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.88] ([82.41.106.58]) by know-smtprelay-1-imp with bizsmtp id uMjn1m00t1FdCC201Mjnh8; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:43:48 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [82.41.106.58] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Cu0xcxID c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=NJHaqoxu+jZWBFO9Gz7ZDg==:117 a=NJHaqoxu+jZWBFO9Gz7ZDg==:17 a=VMyrsS8hpe8A:10 a=F7dUw2KxSdkA:10 a=3NElcqgl2aoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=a5Gf7U6LAAAA:8 a=MlkVIdSbtDAA:10 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=5K1GP0iFCU-JgahPLhwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=88iI8knYSJUA:10 Message-ID: <529515F6.5030407@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:43:18 +0000 From: Robert Burrell Donkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131109 Thunderbird/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@creadur.apache.org CC: Dennis Lundberg Subject: Re: Is it OK to commit to trunk? References: <52873D9E.4090704@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/26/13 20:58, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > All done! Great :-) > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> Seems I spoke to soon... >> I need to fix the failing tests first. >> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >>> Hi Robert Hi Dennis >>> All my changes have been checked into trunk now. >>> Feel free to merge when you have the time and strength for it. I'm feeling good ATM, currently 375/555 commits into the merger of the GitHub code into the branch :-) >>> Give me a shout if you run into conflicts because of my changes. Great I will do I aspire to having the GSoc code in the subversion branch by the end of the week, so hopefully I'll be merging in your changes at the weekend :-) Robert