Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-1957-apmail-creadur-dev-archive=creadur.apache.org@creadur.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52DE91045C
	for <apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sun,  7 Jul 2013 10:08:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 75297 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2013 10:08:10 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75264 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2013 10:08:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@creadur.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@creadur.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@creadur.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.creadur.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75256 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2013 10:08:09 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 10:08:09 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of
 robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk designates 80.0.253.73 as permitted
 sender)
Received: from [80.0.253.73] (HELO
 know-smtprelay-omc-9.server.virginmedia.net) (80.0.253.73)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 10:08:01 +0000
Received: from [10.0.0.88] ([82.41.107.157])
	by know-smtprelay-9-imp with bizsmtp
	id xN7g1l00J3Pn3qi01N7heX; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:07:41 +0100
X-Originating-IP: [82.41.107.157]
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.0 cv=D5QfsYtj c=1 sm=1 a=88d0gGLtypzHIymzaNsW0A==:17
 a=p1AIxE7YGZkA:10 a=Qrn6POJN0BcA:10 a=3NElcqgl2aoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10
 a=a5Gf7U6LAAAA:8 a=pRt0ITcujEEA:10 a=_eghE2dhviu4VFPxK0kA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
 a=88d0gGLtypzHIymzaNsW0A==:117
Message-ID: <51D93DEA.1030507@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:07:38 +0100
From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130702 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ready to Announce The Release ...? [WAS Re: Setting Up Release
 Directory...?]
References: <51952C24.3060804@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <20130517020711.GC13359@igg.local> <20130619070540.GA79140@igmb.local>
 <CAOGo0VZD2J879fhKHkT2T_vCz_okSL3NLJupz5tY9MwMeKCqKA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOGo0VZKH5RK7N5YZ05YbtGP0Ed7RmrF2emO63Jyhd0CNb0RKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOGo0Vaj4NXh3_kpPGt_5mRzeqGoT9ZEN7qKV1tTRk8g4R44Vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <51D85992.7090907@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <CAOGo0VZaj7nnGJBDny6otkA1FEZhVY1veXsbeCGw-f=nd9CgVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VZaj7nnGJBDny6otkA1FEZhVY1veXsbeCGw-f=nd9CgVA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 07/07/13 01:03, sebb wrote:

<snip>

> Note that 0.9 takes much very longer than 0.8 if there are long files
> that don't contain the license near the start.
> This is because 0.9 has several extra scanners, all of which are very
> inefficient on such files.
> 0.8 only had one such scanner.
>
> I've fixed these issues in SVN.

:-)

> So maybe worth holding off until 0.91 (or whatever) can be released.

Should we sort out the binary assembly before cutting a new release or 
just rush out what's in trunk...?

> Anyone that wants 0.9 has probably already fetched it from Maven ...

True

Probably worthwhile doing a limited announcement (creadur website and so on)

Robert