Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71A95F5C0 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16308 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2013 09:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16192 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2013 09:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16163 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2013 09:28:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk designates 81.103.221.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [81.103.221.48] (HELO mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:27:59 +0000 Received: from know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.1]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20130330092738.FDCF23282.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:27:38 +0000 Received: from [82.41.107.157] (helo=[10.0.0.88]) by know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ULs4N-0004To-K3 for dev@creadur.apache.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:27:27 +0000 Message-ID: <5156AFFE.4070706@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:27:26 +0000 From: Robert Burrell Donkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130314 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@creadur.apache.org Subject: Re: Staging Another Candidate for Rat 0.9 [WAS Re: Issue with orgapachecreadur-019] References: <514D9455.9070101@apache.org> <514EC6B6.2020305@blueyonder.co.uk> <514F4438.8040209@blueyonder.co.uk> <51519224.1080203@blueyonder.co.uk> <515418A9.1050803@blueyonder.co.uk> <515557BD.7000202@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <515557BD.7000202@blueyonder.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=AUhbpHVS+xhHrj9wLCYAQoYnFLYUZdbP8UM0GmH2jwk= c=1 sm=0 a=uwBOJQiFoZMA:10 a=IjVrXcCYP1QA:10 a=3NElcqgl2aoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=JlFV72LPb6_RfdilvDMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/29/13 08:58, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 03/28/13 10:17, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> On 03/26/13 20:37, sebb wrote: >>> Not sure you need to worry about the files escaping from the staging >>> repo - that's part of the point, they are not yet published files. >>> So long as you delete the repo they won't be published. >> >> Yes, now that the repo has been dropped, escape is unlikely >> >> I'm comfortable with either trying a 0.9 again or cutting a 0.9.1 >> >> Is there consensus that trying again to cut a 0.9 release would be the >> best approach? > > Assuming no one jumps in sometime soon, I'll assume lazy consensus[1] > for staging a second Apache Rat 0.9 candidate. Okay - I plan to cut a second Apache Rat 0.9 candidate now Robert