creadur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maven SCM Publish Plugin WAS Re: Release Rat ...? [WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum version of Maven to use the Rat plugin]]
Date Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:30:41 GMT
2012/11/17 Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>:
> On 11/15/12 22:03, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> 2012/11/15 Robert Burrell Donkin<robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/12 21:46, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/11/6 Robert Burrell Donkin<robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/06/12 20:08, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2012-11-05 21:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/04/12 16:52, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>> There is a plugin called "Maven SCM Publish Plugin" [1], of which
>>>>>> version 1.0-beta-2 has just been released. The purpose of it is to
>>>>>> publish a Maven generated site to any supported SCM, such as the
ASF
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> svnpubsub model for publishing sites. I haven't tried it myself yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone have a few cycles to give this a try?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I use it for Apache projects (Archiva, Directmemory, helix incubator)
>>>> and works fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've given it a spin, and it seems to work okay. Takes a while, but then
>>> so
>>> does CMS upload. There seem to be a lot of commit messages.
>>>
>>> Is this a known limitation, or am I doing something wrong...?
>>
>> no and no :-)
>
>
> :-)
>
>> javadoc files can be timestamped so recommitted again with site build
>> even if no real content change.
>> maven generated files too but only at day level whereas javadoc seconds
>> level.
>
>
> So... would setting notimestamp on the javadoc plugin be a good idea...?
Sure !
>
>
>
> Even if some tuning is still needed, the plugin seems an improvement to the
> process described in the current documentation[2]. Any objections to me
> switching the build and updating the document?
>
> Robert
> [1]
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/javadoc-mojo.html#notimestamp
> [2] http://creadur.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html



--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Mime
View raw message