creadur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: copyright-notice [WAS Re: [jira] [Commented] (WHISKER-3) The license.vm template makes too many assumptions about skipping licensing details for the primary org and license type.]
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:09:44 GMT
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 11/03/12 12:20, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On 11/02/12 00:44, Chip Childers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>>> <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/29/12 13:46, Chip Childers wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Please do let me know if I can be of any assistance!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The descriptor[1] has a lot of<copyright-notice> elements for licenses
>>>> where they aren't necessary[2]. Did the documentations or the element
>>>> naming
>>>> (say) give the impression that this information is necessary - or
>>>> were they
>>>> included because that the way you want the LICENSE to be ...?
>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Perhaps I hit a bug then, because I found that without a copyright
>>> tag, with-license elements were being skipped.
>>
>>
>> I'll create some tests to investigate
>
>
> With the latest code-base, the only difference after removing
> copyright-notice elements from with-license elements is that the copyright
> claims are gone. Could you check if the problem is fixed in the current code
> base...?
>
> Cheers
>
> Robert
>

I'm not able to reproduce this, so it may very well have been user
error.  Thanks Robert.

Mime
View raw message