creadur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject Re: copyright-notice [WAS Re: [jira] [Commented] (WHISKER-3) The license.vm template makes too many assumptions about skipping licensing details for the primary org and license type.]
Date Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:49:59 GMT
On 11/03/12 12:20, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 11/02/12 00:44, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 10/29/12 13:46, Chip Childers wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Please do let me know if I can be of any assistance!
>>>
>>>
>>> The descriptor[1] has a lot of<copyright-notice> elements for licenses
>>> where they aren't necessary[2]. Did the documentations or the element
>>> naming
>>> (say) give the impression that this information is necessary - or
>>> were they
>>> included because that the way you want the LICENSE to be ...?
>
> <snip>
>
>> Perhaps I hit a bug then, because I found that without a copyright
>> tag, with-license elements were being skipped.
>
> I'll create some tests to investigate

With the latest code-base, the only difference after removing 
copyright-notice elements from with-license elements is that the 
copyright claims are gone. Could you check if the problem is fixed in 
the current code base...?

Cheers

Robert

Mime
View raw message