Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A95E3D336 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65703 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2012 14:49:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65596 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2012 14:49:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65520 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2012 14:49:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:49:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.244] (HELO na3sys009aog118.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:48:54 +0000 Received: from mail-vb0-f72.google.com ([209.85.212.72]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob118.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUIqiwBBaKll3r5bVlnRxUpbzGFtATLRF@postini.com; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:48:34 PDT Received: by mail-vb0-f72.google.com with SMTP id fa15so4667401vbb.11 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=DeGIeBen+8B1cq/BuStMNeSzwf6EClY9JD6eie/aCBE=; b=a9CTyAij8CBSomlmAlArJSI3/DZY04THcFiHJl9vgjILRIM0LX3V/ZH4SeO/mNLExi ZVn9DGpG1eibGuv4Xkvvzh3oKdN/aLHhZV15lV8/Ed6st2KrAiN1P7FcZskg+abDpCZ9 KJcJvgM9vhsRf3ftdeWbhu5k3pXbbysMcxkmx2eowkdX9cKypEe29iHqETeQ8rc3TJTc sR5Oq7KHtYjmeM6p3Ad2ySJWO8zXbe7jloR1xl5i3ySWsF4rJg3ArAx794T8bJYPWRpC qFZwHorDeE3XyUMc0aK510vQVJfewkw5vmwbsRP6Lvnb7zksxaO1Si71AZ0vrp7a9spo dgrQ== Received: by 10.52.36.201 with SMTP id s9mr30235913vdj.101.1351262911992; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:48:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.36.201 with SMTP id s9mr30235903vdj.101.1351262911855; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:48:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.239.135 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:48:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1459161218.140333.1348855147465.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> <837706572.148620.1349111468041.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> <507ADBD0.7010601@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:48:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (WHISKER-3) The license.vm template makes too many assumptions about skipping licensing details for the primary org and license type. From: Chip Childers To: dev@creadur.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkskR7pe1Ao4DghL2tWHjlGjY0hIG+W2ueaI13Jr2Y3WqppIHYubxXn75Pl992WiDdU+hHlwJqiu5WDowmBrknbmenuH0qc5ENm3L6QPlD3N9Wv1A0lDhzoZkBzrjU9iktst7fj/B4nVbzDxqNT9HyCd2REkw== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Another polite nudge. Whisker's a great tool that saved me tons of time. But right now, I can't use anything other than my local modified version, which hinders other project collaborators from helping to maintain the legal docs for CloudStack. I'd really like the CloudStack project to be a strong user of Whisker going forward... Help would be very appreciated! -chip On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> wrote: >>> On 10/09/12 17:52, Chip Childers wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> Hi Chip >>> >>> >>>> Is there anyone on this list that would be able to help me out with >>>> feedback on the bug / patch I submitted? >>> >>> >>> I hope to be able to take a look this evening >>> >>> Thanks for pinging the list and sorry for getting to this so slowly... >>> >>> Robert >>> >> >> Not a problem. Let me know if you have any questions about the >> changes I've proposed! >> >> -chip > > Hi all, > > Just checking in on this, to see if anyone has had an opportunity to > review the issue / patch I submitted. Thanks in advance! > > -chip