Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C01A7C15D for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 18:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24019 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2012 18:57:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23978 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2012 18:57:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23968 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2012 18:57:03 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 18:57:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.0.0.88]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username rdonkin, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 18:57:03 +0000 Message-ID: <4FAEB1CD.4000204@apache.org> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 19:54:05 +0100 From: Robert Burrell Donkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120512 Thunderbird/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@creadur.apache.org Subject: Re: Switch to CMS ... ? References: <4FA6741C.4040101@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/09/12 09:18, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > My feeling is that this means we'll need to maintain two documentation > sets in the future. Wouldn't be happy about that. Hopefully not... AIUI Apache is moving towards hosting all websites using the CMS, so in the future we're likely to have much smoother Maven integration[1]. The way I hope that the CMS will work is by hand crafting top level (Apache Creadur) pages using the CMS[2], and then products (like rat and whisker) either * generate their sites (using Maven, say) and publish then through the CMS (eg [3][4]) * or hand craft them (eg [5]) But until Maven support is smooth, we just update the generated sites rarely... Would this be good enough...? Robert [1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_cms_and_external_build [2] http://rat.staging.apache.org/rat/ [3] http://rat.staging.apache.org/rat/rat/ [4] http://rat.staging.apache.org/rat/whisker/ [5] http://rat.staging.apache.org/rat/tentacles/