Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB2Gbkwy3BrcKxV+mA4vb8iKUrEs0z0yPUeqfZDgTQVxEwXSvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDyatRUf8X111LcFRsZV=nvLoAqVhyNmzwq+z247ZTT-ABv1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAB2GbkzookX9WKqG89gk3muJ0nawzshmW=O0caQUJ-0KbPUYyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB2GbkzookX9WKqG89gk3muJ0nawzshmW=O0caQUJ-0KbPUYyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sean Lang <slang800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:42:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPDyatQFiCyoaJtrZf+uHwbhs7fTRdBWtGGTHi1LiY9u5L4u8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Don=E2=80=99t_Just_Relax=3B_Slouch=3A_A_JS_Client_for_Couc?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?hDB_that_Does_the_Heavy_Lifting?=
To: user <user@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114abf6a368d300554c0c2d9"
archived-at: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:42:46 -0000

--001a114abf6a368d300554c0c2d9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Except, I can't just pass a `.each` function to one of the hundreds of
existing stream related utilities that have been published on npm. I can't
use flow control or destroy the iterator once I've read enough data, unlike
a stream.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017, 09:33 Geoffrey Cox <redgeoff@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sean,
>
> Sure, you could use a stream, but you'd probably end up writing a bunch of
> code to do what you can do in just a few lines with slouch.
>
> For example, here is an example of using the _all_docs API in nano:
> https://github.com/redgeoff/slouch/blob/master/examples/nano-all.js
>
> And here is a similar example using slouch:
> https://github.com/redgeoff/slouch/blob/master/examples/all.js
>
> Slouch really gets cool when you start using a Throttler to provide some
> concurrency without totally slamming your CPU:
>
> https://github.com/redgeoff/slouch/wiki/Don%27t-just-relax.-Slouch%21#example-2---process-a-max-of-5-docs-concurrently
>
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:26 PM Sean Lang <slang800@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > `.each` is kinda weird for iteration. Can't you just return a standard
> > Node.js stream?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017, 09:31 Geoffrey Cox <redgeoff@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We just released, Slouch, another JS client for CouchDB. On the
> surface,
> > it
> > > may seem like we have reinvented the wheel as there is already nano and
> > > nano is pretty awesome. However, Slouch approaches things from a
> slightly
> > > different perspective and has allowed us to greatly simply our
> > application
> > > layer.
> > >
> > > You can read more about it on medium.
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://medium.com/@redgeoff/dont-just-relax-slouch-a-js-client-for-couchdb-that-does-the-heavy-lifting-d8232eba8e2c
> > > >
> > >
> > > Or, jump straight the repo. <https://github.com/redgeoff/slouch>
> > >
> > > I welcome any feedback and hope this helps others.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Geoff
> > >
> >
>

--001a114abf6a368d300554c0c2d9--