Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mark@reevuit.com
In-Reply-To: <14256C9E890B874D989F0828DDB264F2AD3719CD@MX45A.corp.emc.com>
References: <14256C9E890B874D989F0828DDB264F2AD3719CD@MX45A.corp.emc.com>
From: Mark Hahn <mark@hahnca.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:46:09 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAK0S_BBW-zexFcVHTAAXd+m=YFf+SbkKvmj=Ufyjw6Z_p4CAQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which interface/library is better for couchDB
To: user <user@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d85101f7cf104f3cb7daf

--047d7b6d85101f7cf104f3cb7daf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

What platform are you running on?  If it is node then I highly recommend
Nano.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Ramanadham, Radhika <
radhika.ramanadham@emc.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am trying to see if couchDB is a good fit for my project. For the most
> part, looks like it is. I also wanted to know which interface/library is a
> better one with better support out there to talk to couchDB?
> Can you any one help with some suggestions.
>
> Thank you,
> R
>
>

--047d7b6d85101f7cf104f3cb7daf--