Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 721B210241 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89930 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2014 17:30:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 89838 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2014 17:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 89823 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2014 17:30:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:30:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kxepal@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.169] (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:30:38 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ik5so1375224vcb.0 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:30:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d/hXVYvvlYgck3Ig2z5jd9uhji8Gx09zL5HEKF3769w=; b=plAAG7DOAg6XHfmg173aBpS07Cvnd7ZYNyN7gA3is4PFbFxxnjFp0Z1FYGUOiBdGLm 9RraHgdLz/ex4DNo3JFSR/v/Ze/OuLvehcVGKyHV5xUMS6AIGJ1e3cEOR0TT5445Qz7i Y6ed3bDnSRYin/JVgybk6na/ZNw4h2nbFm2Uq25iGWH+tuWW4Eov0GozgWj6mV8D7CxO pH2wE4YDQNibLKFFWfFl8g46u4oDL5pPdyAHiGRVP/K7dxTRud1gYgSxQ+OYsO8aAJd8 w+30ObHWe7RTDY/A7WRC9h7hpa14MvrkOhj8U1/Ok5e+XSgnIVo/9hp+EFgXOMIp5MWf tHpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.69.146 with SMTP id e18mr29226885vdu.15.1395336618004; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.246.202 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:30:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:30:17 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unit Test logging with couchDB.... From: Alexander Shorin To: "user@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Do you mean under "unit test logging with CouchDB" actually storing unittest results as CouchDB documents? -- ,,,^..^,,, On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Knudsen, Ken wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Obviously there's a thousand plus ways of doing this...Has anyone impl= emented or worked with unit testing frameworks but instead of using that fr= ameworks built in logging mechanism, broke out that logging part and used c= ouchDB instead? With couchDB there wouldn't be much 'breaking out' given ho= w easy it is to record log information during a UT run with couchDB...but I= 'm interested in anything someone may have to add outside of the obvious st= uff... > I watched a talk from the MS guys where they incorporated couchDB into= one of their internal unit testing frameworks (Daylight?)...but I can't fi= nd anything more on it so far as what they built on top of that data captur= ed, etc. > > To keep the discussion as global as possible, the term 'Unit Testing' in = this context envelopes all layers, from single component to integration tes= ting. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > ______________________________________________________________________