Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48EA210AF8 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51523 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2014 19:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 51479 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2014 19:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 51471 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2014 19:21:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:21:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of siriele2x3@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.174] (HELO mail-qc0-f174.google.com) (209.85.216.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:21:07 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id e16so4226111qcx.5 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:20:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=b6g4ihEcME6lXVxfBh2xKX5IJY3QDI11mzF/NKl8DkQ=; b=Mltqiur7cPrJIRJjKCktmPG1igm4zJ1jDkOPYeuiiA4eb0bb9JBEXRXTP1JIVyIUTD mjOAtCwbynJJ1PVfYy+RI4BzDRX/INBfX/PBfaA5trIRpG/gTojP1R7sfpONW17aKcv2 kKderui0SHj6aFB1l6vJELnnOVWLaDhUuZdUwFO0e8ihoSEQq2LbWYBRfEgqOqs/svhh 3QMgA5YB8qwLczkvi2O7MNFelcZKxjkRHVk1pvV4nL6oMblKGKH3QFY5JrUCAFkRVqZ8 nDrfKs3m9MPyHkYmOHiWlPLWMzTCdvHScez6KmCR2EnGGitiTIXz40U1HK2veEL0fHrZ fFhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.80.201 with SMTP id u9mr2440864qak.5.1393356046074; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.25.164 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.25.164 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:20:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <80535F5F-B11A-4709-B767-42C9ABF14377@apache.org> References: <80535F5F-B11A-4709-B767-42C9ABF14377@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:20:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: _all_docs vs regular view From: Stanley Iriele To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3e1ec2c0b2804f33ffc0b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c3e1ec2c0b2804f33ffc0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OK that was exactly the answer I was looking for. Many thanks. On Feb 25, 2014 12:58 AM, "Robert Samuel Newson" wrote: > > _all_docs and _changes are both updated (atomically) as part of every > document update. Updating those two things is what it *means* to update a > document. > > I hesitate to call it a "view" though, since it's the database itself just > rendered in the same format as views. You could think of it as "primary > index" vs "secondary index". > > B. > > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 06:59, Stanley Iriele wrote: > > > is the All docs a special view?...it never has to be primed like > > traditional views. why is that?...if a use a list function to fold over a > > certain number of keys during a period of a lot of writes does this view > > stay up to date ? or does it behave like a regular view? > > --001a11c3e1ec2c0b2804f33ffc0b--