couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Florian Westreicher Bakk.techn." <st...@meredrica.org>
Subject Re: CouchDB vs RethinkDB
Date Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:55:48 GMT
You will need the replicator db when something crashes, I should have mentioned that. 

Jens Alfke <jens@couchbase.com> wrote:
>
>On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Florian Westreicher Bakk.techn.
><stuff@meredrica.org> wrote:
>
>> Couch can and will handle net splits. If you use the replicator db.
>Conflicts will be detected and a winning version is determistically
>chosen on each node, resulting in the same doc everywhere. 
>
>This is true, but it doesn’t matter whether or not you use the
>replicator db. Any replication has these properties.
>
>CouchDB replication supports a fully P2P mesh model with no masters, no
>permanent connections, and arbitrary connection topology. New revisions
>will propagate between the peers until everyone has a copy.
>
>—Jens

-- 
Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Mime
View raw message