couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stanley Iriele <siriele...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb
Date Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:52:06 GMT
Ahh...phone typo... What he said kinda made me doubt my knowledge... But
I'm glad that what I thought is right
On Oct 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Jens Alfke" <jens@couchbase.com> wrote:

>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb"
>
> (Is “to,es” a mathematical term or just a typo for “times”? ;-)
>
> I think this comparison is apples vs. oranges, as R-tree is a data
> structure while CouchDB is a program. There is a geospatial index extension
> for CouchDB (https://github.com/couchbase/geocouch/) which likely uses
> R-trees internally; if you need to do lots of fast range searches (in one
> or more dimensions) it would be a good idea to try it out.
>
> —Jens

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message