couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filippo Fadda <>
Subject Re: osqa
Date Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:31:56 GMT
Someone told me to not argue with you and I don't. :-)

Anyway I'm not saying OSQA doesn't fit the CouchDB community needs, I'm just saying OSQA can't
be compared with StackOverflow in term of functionalities. StackOverflow is a complex software
system with versioning management, moderation based on votes, synonyms, it uses extensively
ElasticSearch, it provides a way to query its data.
OSQA is just a simple clone with basic functionalities that doesn't scale, made for personal
use or minor communities. Different things for different jobs. But if you don't trust, like
or simply you don't want use an external service like StackOverflow, OSQA can be an option.
Just remember that the project is not active anymore, and there is a cost related its administration.


On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Good news the goal is not to replace SO (though the software isn't really
> that complex, the difficulty is more to achieved the critical mass of users
> to start a business model. anyway that'sanother topic ...).
> My goal is to have a website managed by the Apache CouchDB project where
> the neutrality, privacy and independence is guaranteed. Having a system we
> can host where all the content is under the apache license would make sure
> it is. I don't want to force anyone interested to go on a private owned
> website whose the business mode is still to come, provide his login or
> having to read some advertising just to find answers.
> Another goal for me is to create a knowledge base owned and controlled by
> the project under a license compatible with the project. The CC-BY-SA will
> require a lot of work on the long term to even include a response in our
> doc (asking for the author agreement etc...) . Having such a knowledge base
> that can be included anywhere without much effort is a goal that worth the
> effort imo.
> That's the goal I would like to achieve. I am not saying this tool is OK.
> maybe we need something better. I would have time I would make something
> working with the ml, jira and eventually replicable, but for the next 2
> months I have not such time. But would be happy to support such project or
> anything that could be adapted to it.
> - benoit

View raw message