Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 214E110BDD for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13186 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2013 08:50:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 12801 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2013 08:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 12789 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2013 08:50:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:50:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.27] (HELO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:50:38 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61BE21234 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:50:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from betaweb1 ([10.202.2.10]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:50:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codekick.com; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh= 2UDjHkxOdAnDABPOKRXhEnkyHlk=; b=HPq7hHGFku8tmaLtN5GIaNvQSghIS4Cp 3kqd0Z4mZljBuKddiTXUNB1jp8rgLPQWS7ESDuWlCCws/yHA3ob229Zfj9O5ojne oBQx9MnAJvW+ypiud22Js97AXrB5yZex9t6VMpRcwxtLkSvyY56Hm7zML4NEBaQg Ii+EdIt81Hw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=2UDjHkxOdAnDABPOKRXhEnkyHlk=; b=dvc CBfoqx7yYQ1FEF/MHC7Q4VGb5S65xBl8F3pddUmpUDVqBRgu9gCqiinTdwFa3J3I OUY9gwiY79zH4fJ0xM0Z74MAdV43XmKYSfmFJEOq1g4WcFK4LGLdAEwPs+rs45kj UVMflGAo5454zUebSEVVwkcY1tT4lkOs3I7/7PaU= Received: by betaweb1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 46D5C74008D; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:50:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1378975813.11651.21027637.5E8DBB01@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: RkhbDbtVBAjrQRmROuHYtBPCiCDAOnxW+es+ueRJlYp7 1378975813 From: Calle Arnesten To: user@couchdb.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-298fbd44 In-Reply-To: References: <1378926029.28132.20794405.081CF630@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: View files 3x larger when moving from CouchDB 1.2 to 1.4 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:50:13 +0200 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My mistake. The view compaction hadn't run properly. I now rerun it for all the views of the database and it's down to 18GB. Best regards Calle Arnesten On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, at 21:51, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > It's likely you've not got compression running/set e.g. snappy or similar. > > Any more details? > > On 11 September 2013 21:00, Calle Arnesten wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I replicated the databases of a CouchDB 1.2 server to a brand new CouchDB 1.4 server. However, I noticed that the hidden view directories now take up about 3 times more space than before. For example on the 1.2 database one of the hidden view directories took 30GB and now it takes 90GB. What is the reason for this drastic file size increase? Can I change a setting to have it behave as 1.2? > > > > I have run view compaction without getting a significant change. > > > > Best regards > > Calle Arnesten