Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPNuaCjQ3wgAd1BMyNUtip0rztK6n3Ex3rnq-hc=NXwL4Wt+pg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPNuaCjQ3wgAd1BMyNUtip0rztK6n3Ex3rnq-hc=NXwL4Wt+pg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrey Kuprianov <andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:54:33 +0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAG+HO1ysanHLAYTh5XXuN=WO3RMsjxsY9c5nXjGiHy1n_m74mA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Erlang vs JavaScript
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacbce831416504e3f3991f

--047d7bacbce831416504e3f3991f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I had a 5-6 times speed boost yesterday, after converting one of my design
docs to Erlang. Like a breath of fresh air, if you ask me.

  Andrey


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm curious... What exactly is the performance gain from writing
> views/shows/ etc in Erlang vs JavaScript... From what I've seen the
> JavaScript view server is sufficiently fast and feature complete.
>
> So my question is this.... Is the Erlang view server that much faster?...
> Is there another gain that I'm missing?..and is it as feature complete as
> the JavaScript equivalent?
>
> Regards,
>
> Stanley
>

--047d7bacbce831416504e3f3991f--