couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stanley Iriele <siriele...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Erlang vs JavaScript
Date Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:14:23 GMT
True... But the only way for that to happen is for them to bypass several
other layers of security... In which case I'd have much bigger problems to
worry about
On Aug 14, 2013 8:08 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" <andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com>
wrote:

> So far it seems very promising. :) However, what they say can happen is
> that since Erlang code has no sandbox, anything could be done to the system
> through design views, if your database is compromised.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > 5-6 times eh?...that would give me an honest reason for picking up Erlang
> > again....I'm going to try converting all of my views to Erlang and see
> what
> > happens..what's the worst that can happen? :-)
> > On Aug 14, 2013 7:55 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" <andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I had a 5-6 times speed boost yesterday, after converting one of my
> > design
> > > docs to Erlang. Like a breath of fresh air, if you ask me.
> > >
> > >   Andrey
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm curious... What exactly is the performance gain from writing
> > > > views/shows/ etc in Erlang vs JavaScript... From what I've seen the
> > > > JavaScript view server is sufficiently fast and feature complete.
> > > >
> > > > So my question is this.... Is the Erlang view server that much
> > faster?...
> > > > Is there another gain that I'm missing?..and is it as feature
> complete
> > as
> > > > the JavaScript equivalent?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Stanley
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message