couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogate...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Did not understand this part about CouchDB
Date Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:16:40 GMT
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:

> Yves,
>
> Did you see Adam's reply to your original copy of this request on our
> erlang@ mailing list? It's best not to cross-post for this reason.
>
> B
>
>
> On 14 July 2013 00:08, Yves S. Garret <yoursurrogategod@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Jens Alfke <jens@couchbase.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 13, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Yves S. Garret <
> yoursurrogategod@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The sentence is just above Figure 2 (which is roughly 2/3 of the way
> >> > down the page).  What I don't understand is why would concurrency
> >> > be impacted when latency is reduced?  Wouldn't latency reduce as
> >> > more processes are created to do more processing?
> >>
> >> Well, it only says concurrency is “affected”, it doesn’t say in which
> >> direction.
> >>
> >> To be honest, I don’t understand those graphs or the accompanying
> >> sentences at all. I can’t tell which axes are dependent on which, or
> even
> >> whether they’re supposed to be two- or three-dimensional.
> >>
> >> —Jens
> >
> >
> > *shrug*
> >
> > The comment about bandwidth was the only thing that I came up with.
>

Hi, yes I do.  This was my mistake, I meant to post this to the couchdb
mailing list and accidentally sent it to the erlang one.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message