Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of snbartell@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: commonjs in validation docs
From: Stephen Bartell <snbartell@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6941CDA6-21FB-4A37-A275-605BFFDE4C89@utt.fr>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 00:30:55 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39C72F8B-581A-4562-AC2A-59E46717F47C@gmail.com>
References: <BB4A8E0D-88F9-48B2-ADDC-D0A49EC0F097@gmail.com>
 <CAO5PmOq+Vu7rJ65+rr8xtLVi9mUyAdfiE4e_R0g8ttxPcgrd7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <E701ABAA-EE68-4E40-BE09-29CE6B997BEE@gmail.com>
 <6941CDA6-21FB-4A37-A275-605BFFDE4C89@utt.fr>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org

I thought it was strange too,  but thats from the docs =
(http://couchdb.readthedocs.org/en/latest/query-servers.html#commonjs-modu=
les). The way I interpret the example is "its ok to put validation docs =
inside the views field so that you can have access to commonjs =
exports.".  This must just be a shitty example.


On Jun 3, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Aur=E9lien B=E9nel <aurelien.benel@utt.fr> =
wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>=20
>> So I can't seem to get a validate_update_doc nested in a view field =
to work. =20
>=20
> Why would you do that? Validations and views are completely different =
concepts.
>=20
>>  "views": {
>>      "validate_doc_update": "function(newdoc, olddoc, ctx, sec) =
{throw {forbidden: 'You shall not pass.'}}" // this one doesn't work
>=20
> If you write this, `validate_doc_update` will be just a view. I'm =
pretty sure this is not what you want.
> As a view, it should have a map and could have a reduce function, but =
would have nothing to do with validation.
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Aur=E9lien
>=20