couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Regarding `_bulk_docs` atomicity [Was: Re: How to find the change sequence of a document's revision]
Date Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:26:19 GMT
I've radically simplified the language on the wiki. It doesn't bother
describing the history of this feature and just cuts right to it.

B.

On 23 December 2012 15:24, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
<ciprian.craciun@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>> A meta-point, is that the precise semantics of all_or_nothing:true,
>> and uses of it, are at least partially stepping away from a core
>> notion in CouchDB, that we're document-oriented, that we consciously
>> don't provide group update semantics, knowing that they are difficult
>> to scale.
>>
>> Anyway, Xmas lecture over. :) I think, as long as you avoid
>> replication, then your hack will work with current all_or_nothing:true
>> behavior, I just worry that you're avoiding embracing the document
>> model by doing so.
>
>
>     Thank you very much for your explanation! This was what I was
> looking for. :)
>
>     Now about your observation related to the CouchDB document-centric
> design, indeed you are right: starting to use such semantics that make
> promises at other levels of granularity than a document, will depart
> from the "core" model of CouchDB, and in the long term will get the
> developer in all kind of strange situations. (But using such features
> sparingly would solve some issues that are otherwise too complicated.)
>
>     Thanks again,
>     Ciprian.

Mime
View raw message