Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 870B0DCD6 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21874 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2012 12:52:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 21652 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2012 12:52:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 21594 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2012 12:52:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:52:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stoo.goff@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:52:00 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e10so2159974iej.11 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:51:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FAdhbKy8oYZNVXgMA5gj32KzVndJpoQRDDBGj4qsVnw=; b=GWlaQMYhOjnTw7KcX299lbFscnct7UFnu8tZe3Zfv4lytVm5KnJc03n2Vx9yY6i8gA zQ8w5LU2bw0+trnzLj2oeWTiw2aXHqq24RSN3X5M9ckAbqcSY74w/BUPQn/ZctgLmq4v RoF2n0CsDb6mzTBTvPhIEie0q9iM8CAPZ0YxIFHMnEULfSgoM+cYuP5FXXm8wmmjmJRs TY3Yc093Yl5TiljcXHjrQqeASKyyXMK9rXCdZQven24EoYrONQa0Q7A2BKgD2FIDI8W2 A+P4Q00qeOaDEMoz6hBJdQqJb9hpsqiEpz48a2WkQfNaYFvAmT6PzgtvB3Z3dTpuEkE5 yQZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.16.177 with SMTP id h17mr4429981igd.37.1352292699595; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.0.81 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:51:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121107143025.30a5147d@eee-az> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:51:39 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Remote view looks different to localhost From: Stoo Goff To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426cd0fde3cf04cde72dbe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04426cd0fde3cf04cde72dbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The replication was a single run, rather than continuous and it was before I set up any user accounts. It's not really the replication that's the issue, though. If I ssh into the server and run curl -X GET http://localhost:5894/muninn I get different results to when I run the following command from my dev machine: curl -X GET http://user:pass@odin:5894/muninn Where user:pass would be the admin account and odin is the remote server. On 7 November 2012 12:44, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 7 November 2012 13:30, svilen wrote: > > and if u add ?_all_docs=true what docs would u get? > > (do check the syntax) > > Hi Stoo, > > I'd check that the DBs really are the same. Did you use filtered > replication, or not replicate as an admin? Was is a continuous repl or > not? > > Use `curl http://localhost:5984//_all_docs` and diff the > output of both DBs. What's missing? > > A+ > Dave > --f46d04426cd0fde3cf04cde72dbe--