From user-return-22352-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Thu Oct 4 10:59:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3D3AD425 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20903 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 10:59:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 20706 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 10:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 20669 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 10:58:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:58:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 209.85.210.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.180] (HELO mail-ia0-f180.google.com) (209.85.210.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:58:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f6so134423iag.11 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tumbolia.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VskmDFL1OzOQ+w5A/utSg7oxrZ15JcgavJyivV8v9BE=; b=a4sKhjqfsLJOarEhKahJ2m7noWcyI0nm1lbnnDbefd2oB55XY6KBIgjCp3/UVup2la s8JObIjNQARKlwAeD9ihWMXi8YyQUokMyriHN69aA9C7fMjPqZ4v7DX07m4UMX9N+hSL Dhsf3A2QtQ5XNRQIHph4fltVytSmovZSuXrkg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VskmDFL1OzOQ+w5A/utSg7oxrZ15JcgavJyivV8v9BE=; b=HAWEDR6ck9szhnc869U6Dfrs5/3kc5ht8oGYXNfUfARi/pLf3p+SucIOxXZy0pllBc noIz7UkU25qw3tgPmPOuKHJB7dZlQfmWX6iR7Vm4D9rZqzK3eX7XyfZbMClnPhAXhLYn RLtmu25W3D91DAaNbsCz0mN+D8xVw59zYTeMEqx7CtH1GemTfVI1XALCihhi65pT2MLI Xag+8dz/7vKLkPoMY90kmvQ7mqAMKJTot3XdVdJpiQxARZF/KVTkDa6faPqq/5s6QOzt YJOZvimAcuBpiT2WS6oo34kzWZNjZi61CP1zlEDQ2+fCu/l7Pbxq9uwNoDMB12puFXRz m/MQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.183.199 with SMTP id eo7mr4228688igc.52.1349348312198; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.63.19 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [79.97.124.139] In-Reply-To: <-4892277256703181100@unknownmsgid> References: <1C05AE2905E44F3CBA65FB488C1FBD8A@thenoi.se> <31E705D43C964074AB1FE98B2E1771D2@thenoi.se> <5018D969-4F96-4B51-A9B8-E6AD9934957C@apache.org> <7CEEE59A91D84C19BEEE55E89B3D9A18@thenoi.se> <353118BA-FF98-4656-BCB0-5628517279C6@apache.org> <-4892277256703181100@unknownmsgid> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:58:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: eacces error From: Noah Slater To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934042dd3ae7604cb39a2f3 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhkY+90QOq6vHlDNXnFOBj/cDilfCtatbVugyuxHyQa5zk2lKxvzyQ+IWRIe4k8L/EGYMg X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae934042dd3ae7604cb39a2f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Should we patch this before the move to an OTP system? Does anybody have a patch? On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > Yup. This is the silly thing where, in interactive mode, erlang will > such current working for for modules. Since we don't "cd" in the > script to a guaranteed readable dir, spurious errors abound. > > A proper OTP launch would not do this as all paths are defined up front. > > Sent from the pool side with a glass of wine in hand. > > On 3 Oct 2012, at 17:00, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > > > On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > > >> On 3 October 2012 16:49, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > >>> Yep, that matches up with my experience. > >>> > >>> Adam > >>> > >>> On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Martin Hewitt wrote: > >>> > >>>> This one's further complicated by the fact that, after spitting out > errors at start, CouchDB appears to operate normally with no further > errors. Generating a view produces another error, but the view is generated > correctly, and further view updates do not produce errors. > >>>> > >>>> Very curious behaviour. > >>>> > >>>> Martin > >> > >> Aaah this vaguely comes back to me now, hopefully enough to trigger > >> somebody else's memory with something correct. > >> > >> I think it's due to the search path for the erlang code loader > >> including directories it can't check/view. So if you can do a dtrace > >> or truss or whatever , this should turn up pretty quickly. > >> > >> A+ > >> Dave > > > > Oh, that makes a ton of sense. Thanks for the tip! > -- NS --14dae934042dd3ae7604cb39a2f3--