From user-return-22345-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Thu Oct 4 06:34:58 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85CF19222 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 06:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1698 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 06:34:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 759 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 06:34:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 706 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 06:34:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:34:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [91.195.24.3] (HELO mail.open.bg) (91.195.24.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:34:38 +0000 Received: from [78.83.28.88] (port=39934 helo=eee-az) by mail.open.bg with esmtpsa (Cipher SSL3.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.77) id 1TJf0g-00054D-MK by authid with login for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:34:14 +0300 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:35:13 +0300 From: svilen To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: any good way of filtering out your own _changes? Message-ID: <20121004093513.47fe9a1d@eee-az> In-Reply-To: References: <20121003171913.02e33b2b@eee-az> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org so noone to suggest something? > > so i have a local db that replicates bidirectional with several > > others. an app uses local db, listens to _changes and also puts > > things sometimes. Any way to avoid it seeing it's own changes? > > i guess i can put a manual field e.g. "source" to *each* document or > > something... but that's not very neat. but may be the only way, > > hmmm - e.g. how to differ between different copies of same app.. > > running in parallel. svil