From user-return-21163-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Sun Jun 10 18:47:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C874C45D for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56879 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2012 18:47:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 56600 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2012 18:47:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 56165 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2012 18:47:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:47:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of klimpong@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bk0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:47:19 +0000 Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3601874bkc.11 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=qfmvjwdLbiB8Zq2u2Pfq0sQ2WqqzvYye2DHuc/UIMFg=; b=zSABmccNZ8IKlaS12+MmW0DGKQwTYJAWl6UlRCD5MZXDp50DeNNvrISI5CgUDycBLC xjyLmOQVR4JAXzSV1BmImEU5ojBPcpy+U0cGB2R0Si71O09r+4wO7NUKl9RQvAZMTdeZ 3jpz8prflN1w+LfCm/3UTC1ReKIfv2I+3hRZpEo6ZOKqy9jNRmW1FrxgqZ6ey7XOjB0G 2bAPoYp5ubuqmPWO2IfPGd0j65y6BHH4AxMwcMmVSmC/46S9p7lMwJLlKaW7R3WHhmde 7yWwkxVuatvM5PA9PrHKwFW/eWYvPW7F7rRBTEK07jFEhoG+um25EJqXpDEDoaRb1tqA raAw== Received: by 10.205.33.136 with SMTP id so8mr8941511bkb.1.1339354017776; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.226] (p5797A04A.dip.t-dialin.net. [87.151.160.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm13610914bku.9.2012.06.10.11.46.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:46:54 +0200 From: till To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Cc: user@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <5FC3BB9E829A4107AD29CF578730A107@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CouchDB packaging for Ubuntu X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.1 (build 1081.51) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4fd4eb9e_75e0858a_1357" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --4fd4eb9e_75e0858a_1357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hey, =5B CC'd user=40 to get more feedback. =5D I made some progress. I have builds for the following more or less ready: =20 * karmic * lucid * maverick * oneiric * natty * precise It's building and I am trying to refine the process a bit. So it might br= eak in between =5Baka WIP=5D. I'm just adding this as a disclaimer. https://launchpad.net/=7Etill-php/+archive/couchdb Would you mind testing my builds=3F :) So far, I only tested lucid briefl= y (and ran into the xulrunner issue, which I think I have auto-fixed now)= . Besides I just started it up, created a DB and entered some docs into i= t. (Also, =40Jan:) =20 I'm trying to figure out how to setup more automated testing. =22make che= ck=22 always requires the source tree to be present, I'd like =22make che= ck=22 against my installed binaries. I saw the =22verify installation=22 = in =46uton =E2=80=93 something like that for the command line so I can it= erate on these builds and trigger a =22test this=22 in a continuous integ= ration setup. Building is part of it, but since building a binary and ins= talling it are two separate steps I want to ensure that the second step a= lso works. I am still trying to wrap my head around a setup where I can m= aybe knife up a few instances in THE CLOUD, install my package, run its t= est-suite and confirm. Till =20 On Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 11:13 PM, CGS wrote: > Hi, > =20 > I have CouchDB 1.2.0 with Erlang R15B01 on Ubuntu 12.10 up and running.= > Unfortunately, I've never built a deb package, so, I cannot provide suc= h a > package. Nevertheless, if you have any problem in building it, just let= me > know and I will try to help. > =20 > About the mailing list, I suppose adding the CouchDB users (to get an i= dea > which is the desired Ubuntu distro) and/or Debian (you may get support = in > testing and debugging) lists wouldn't be such a bad idea, but it's your= > call here. > =20 > CGS > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:15 PM, till wrote: > =20 > > Hey, > > =20 > > I've been scratching my own itch and started building 1.2.0 for a cou= ple > > Ubuntu distributions. > > =20 > > It's a WIP but I was wondering the following: > > =20 > > 1) It builds =E2=80=93 but does it work=3F Is the best bet to run the= test suite in > > futon, or is there something I could run on the command line when the= > > package is installed=3F I'd prefer the command line to include it in = some > > sort of continuous testing without a browser. > > =20 > > 2) Who'd have some interest in testing this=3F > > =20 > > 3) Which distributions are wanted =E2=80=93 I started with karmic and= lucid and > > had planned to build all the way up to 12.10. > > =20 > > 4) Is there a mailing list to discuss this, or is dev=40 fine=3F > > =20 > > Till =20 --4fd4eb9e_75e0858a_1357--